Scottish Episcopal Church unsuspend Anne Dyer despite finding that she could realistically be convicted of bullying, harassment and discrimination

The Scottish Episcopal Church had charged Anne Dyer with multiple offences, including of having bullied, harassed and discriminated against a disabled adult. The SEC found that there was a “legal sufficiency” of evidence to support these charges and that there was a “realistic prospect” of convicting Dyer of them at trial.

However, despite these findings, the SEC chose to end the disciplinary process against Dyer before the charges were due to be heard at its Clergy Discipline Tribunal. It then lifted Dyer’s suspension, allowing her to return to the position of power she occupied when the SEC’s own charges indicate she misconducted herself, including by bullying, harassing and discriminating against a disabled adult.

The charge relating to this particularly troubling allegation against Dyer reads as follows (you can read the original document here):

‘You did behave or conduct yourself in a manner unbecoming of a member of the clergy and in such away which brings or is likely to bring the Church into disrepute in that you did, between November 2018 and September 2020, bully, harass and discriminate against [PERSON A], and in particular you did:

(a)     bully, harass and discriminate against [PERSON A] to the point that she was signed off work, in breach of SEC safeguarding policies;

(b)     commence an ultra vires review of [PERSON A]’s role, in breach of the Episcopal Diocese of Aberdeen and Orkney Constitution;

(c)     bully, harass and discriminate against [PERSON A] by conducting an improper and ultra vires review of her role and making her redundant, in breach of the EDAO Constitution and SEC safeguarding policies; and

(d)     further prejudice [PERSON A]’s wellbeing by making her redundant despite the government’s furlough scheme designed to ensure that organisations did not need to make precipitous redundancies during the first “lockdown”.’

An anonymous member of St Paul’s and St George’s Church, one of SEC’s biggest donor churches, said: “The SEC seems to have lost the plot. How can it possibly be right to unsuspend somebody your own independent lawyer has found could realistically be convicted of bullying and discriminating against a disabled person?

“It’s a sick decision and shows, regardless of all its pretences to the contrary, how unsafe the SEC really is on Bishop Mark Strange’s, the other bishops’ and the Provincial Standing Committee’s watch. Goodness knows what John Wylie, the SEC’s safeguarding tsar, is doing. I can only assume he condones the SEC’s decision, which seems to be to protect its own bishop at all costs, regardless of the harm it causes others.

“I hope Ps and Gs draws a line in the sand and makes it clear that the SEC has behaved unacceptably. We must suspend our giving to the SEC until it demonstrates that it is serious about safeguarding people.

“Its the only course open to us as Christians who place store in faith, people and community rather than power, control, and club memberships and expensive foreign trips.


Posted

Comments

3 responses

  1. Anonymous avatar
    Anonymous

    I’m digusted with the SEC. Would it dismiss allegations of sexual abuse in the same way? What if somebody was physically assualted?

    It’s never OK to sweep allegations of abuse under the carpet.

    You just couldn’t make it up – failing a disabled person who seems to have been abused to protect your own… This is everything that is wrong with the Church.

  2. Tom avatar
    Tom

    Bullying, harrasing and discriminating a disabled person is just not okay. How can this bishop be allowed to still remain in post?

  3. Concerned avatar
    Concerned

    Hypocrisy is the only word to describe what has occurred. Vulnerable people were abused and the procurator stops the procedure nominally to stop them being distressed when having to describe their experience and lets the fox back into the hen house to pick where she had left off. This is the College of Bishops endorsing abuse and setting aside any attempts at safeguarding. It can’t continue. Churches and individuals need to leave. We need the creation of a Scottish Anglican Church committed to protecting the vulnerable

Leave a Reply

(Please feel free to comment anonymously)